Rigid-flex PCBs provide invaluable space, weight and wiring savings by integrating rigid board and flexible circuit sections into a single assembly. Adoption continues accelerating across consumer wearables, aerospace systems, medical devices and automotive dashboards. But determining total cost tradeoffs versus alternatives has remained a major obstacle.
This article details key considerations, guidelines, and formulas for accurately projecting rigid-flex PCB expenses including:
- Drivers of rigid-flex costs
- Methods for estimating budgets
- Tools for cost modeling and simulation
- Techniques to optimize pricing
Mastering rigid-flex PCB cost analysis and forecasting enables making sound technical architectural decisions while meeting program financial targets.
Cost Drivers for Rigid Flex Circuits
Unlike standard rigid PCB fabrication which involves well defined cost modeling, rigid-flex pricing depends upon a more complex combination of materials, process and capability variables:
1. Layer Count
Rigid-flex combinations present modules with varying layer needs driving up composite cost. More layers mean higher lamination/drilling expenses.
2. Material Mix
The amalgamation of rigid laminates, flexible dielectrics, adhesive films and cover layers contributes disproportionately to expenses.
3. Registration Accuracy
Maintaining layer alignments between flex and rigid sections during fabrication requires precision increasing production costs.
4. Low Volume
Customized rigid-flex builds negate high volume cost savings from panelization driving up cost per board.
5. Manual Processing
Inability to leverage high speed automated assembly steps also necessitates costlier manual intervention.
6. Qualification Testing
Extensive DFx analysis plus electrical, mechanical and environmental testing requirements add cost to ensure reliability.
7. Rework Expenses
High integration complexity with thin flex layers often prevents reworking flawed sections driving scrap costs.
While significant, modeling these elements enables building reasonable budget estimates.
Approaches for Estimating Rigid-Flex Costs
Establishing reliable rigid-flex PCB pricing targets involves synthesizing data from multiple points:
1. Gather Technical Specifications
Key details include:
- Layer counts for rigid vs flex sections
- Board dimensions
- Flex layer composition and thickness
- Lamination processes
- Line width/space
2. Define Fabrication Scenarios
Mapumptions help frame cost scenarios:
- Batch sizes
- Lead times
- Acceptable defect rates
- Rework abilities
- Preproduction verification needs
3. Research Material Costs
Understand currentexpense factors like:
- Base laminates per sq foot
- Copper foil per pound
- Dielectrics per sq foot
- Adhesives per yard
4. Estimate Labor Rates
Incorporate geographic labor rates into models both for engineering development and production.
5. Request Fabricator Feedback
Engage prospective manufacturers for guidance on process charges based on specifications provided.
With these dimensions collected, cost estimation approaches can be applied.
Rigid Flex Cost Estimation Methods
While no universal cost model exists for rigid flex, hybrids of the following techniques produce good approximations:
1. Layer Count Analogies
Compare to pricing history of builds with similar layer counts incremented for additional process factors:
Rigid Flex Cost = Rigid PCB Cost @ N layers + (2N) Flex Layers @ Y cost/layer
2. Parametric Cost Estimation
Statistical models based on metrics like area, layer count, line width fit curves to generate initial estimates for quoting.
3. Cost Volume Models
Basic models allocating percent cost contribution by major modules like layers, materials, labor and overhead for what-if scenario analysis.
4. Detailed Bottom-Up Costing
Map process flow to enumerate every step cost like lamination, drilling, testing, etc for precise budgeting.
While rigorous, bottom-up methods provide highest accuracy, parametric and analogy models offer quicker budget guidance.
Next we’ll explore expert cost simulation software purpose built for rigid flex pricing.
Leveraging Rigid-Flex Cost Modeling Platforms
To overcome limited historical data for estimating rigid-flex expenses, developers like Flexible Circuit Technolgies have created dedicated tools like FCT’s Rigid Flex PCB Cost Calculator.
These online solutions provide:
1. Flexible Configuration
Intuitive step by step qualification of board specifications across hundreds of parameters for both rigid and flex sections.
2. Real-Time Budget Projections
Instant exact cost estimate feedback as configurations evolve supports tradeoff decisions without weeks of quoting delays.
3. Custom Reporting & Sharing
Details like graphics,BOMs and layered build views allow sharing project configurations with stakeholders and fabrication partners.
4. Design Guidance
Embedded DFM principles highlight considerations for optimizing manufacturability to minimize revisions.
Expert platform analyses augment standard estimation models for developing reliable pricing targets to inform rigid flex adoption decisions.
Next we’ll review methods for optimizing cost once estimates reach initial targets.
Techniques for Cost Optimization
With expenses inherently higher for rigid flex, costs can quickly spiral beyond acceptable budgets. Strategies to guard against this include:
1. Standardization
Defining and reusing standard layer configs, thickness, materials and fabrication approaches slashes cost through volume leverage over time.
2. Design for Manufacturability
Simplifying layer counts, conductor geometries, registration indexes and tolerances practically reduces production expenses.
3. Unbundle Production
Separating straightforward rigid PCB fabrication and assembly from custom manual flexible circuit steps contained outsourcing risk.
4. Build In Margin
Allocate contingency for extra testing, qualification, revision cycles beyond assumptions during project planning to prevent surprises.
Preemptively mitigating expenses enables rigid flex PCB solutions to meet target product costs.
When Do Rigid-Flex Designs Make Economic Sense?
With smarter estimation and optimization, the business case to adopt rigid flex PCB architecture typically works where:
1. Component Volume Savings Exceed ~30%
Board real estate and density benefits over conventional implementations warrant cost premiums.
2. Electrical Connections Would Use >25 Cables
Reduced wires and connectors outweigh integrated flex circuit expense.
3. Thermal Load Demands Heat Sinks ~10% Smaller
Lightweighting and performance gains against traditional heat dissipation methods offset costs.
4. Physics Would Mandate Partitioning Across ≥ 3 Rigid Boards
Space, interference and replacement factors favor consolidation even at higher fabrication prices.
While not universally cost effective yet, understanding crossover points allows capitalizing where rigid flex PCB technology delivers system savings.
Conclusion
Blending rigid board and flexible circuit technologies clearly provides tremendous space, weight and performance advantages albeit at higher expense. But accurately modeling cost implications against electrical and mechanical architectural tradeoffs enables sound technical decision making.
By mastering parametric estimating approaches, leveraging expert cost simulation tools, and diligently applying optimization techniques rigid flex PCB solutions can deliver substantial net benefits across a growing sphere of applications.
To further elaborate on key questions around rigid flex pricing dynamics, we’ve compiled several frequent additional questions with responses.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are typical cost per square inches for rigid-flex PCBs?
With a high mix of variable configurations, $25-50 per square inch serves as a general budget range on average from prototyping to moderate production volumes.
How much does increasing rigid layer count impact overall cost?
Extending rigid layer count often directly increments cost in ~30% steps per layer as lamination/drilling processes multiply.
Do offshore fabrication locations provide substantial rigid flex savings?
Some cost savings is attainable but typically outweighed by higher quality/yields demanded of complex rigid flex designs favoring advanced North America manufacturers.
What level of cost reductions can be expected over time?
As adoption continues gaining stream, increasing competition combined with accumulation of standardized design elements and economies of scale can drop prices 2-4% annually.
In summary, cost need not be prohibitive for committing to rigid flex PCB approaches given appropriate analysis and optimization practices. What may have been unattainable budgets for rigid flex before can quickly transform into sound investments.
No comments:
Post a Comment